Word Of Warcraft guide

Amirdrassil S3 Week 18: Full Rankings and Sample Sizes

Read the March 2024 Amirdrassil Week 18 table with accurate sample counts, one consistent damage metric, and a note about the original source’s chart mismatch.

Amirdrassil S3 Week 18: Full Rankings and Sample Sizes3 minutes
On this pageThe March 12, 2024 Week 18 Table1 / 4

The March 12, 2024 Week 18 Table

Subtlety, Frost Death Knight and Unholy lead the typed table in Anshlun’s March 19, 2024 report. The original Week 18 article identifies Mythic Amirdrassil, the week of March 12 and the 95th-percentile overall-damage view in Dragonflight Season 3.

All 26 entries below belong to that same published table. The lower positions do not switch to an all-percentiles metric halfway down the list. Weekly change means positions, not a percentage increase in damage.

PositionSpecializationSource populationWeekly position change
1Subtlety Rogue14,7600
2Frost Death Knight2,501+1
3Unholy Death Knight8,347+2
4Fury Warrior21,262−2
5Retribution Paladin47,555−1
6Arcane Mage6,0660
7Arms Warrior7,0350
8Shadow Priest12,9340
9Enhancement Shaman14,374+3
10Elemental Shaman3,946+7
11Havoc Demon Hunter27,7290
12Frost Mage9,870+10
13Demonology Warlock22,742−3
14Fire Mage13,460−1
15Outlaw Rogue7,543−6
16Marksmanship Hunter1,287−2
17Assassination Rogue2,818−2
18Survival Hunter1,628+6
19Devastation Evoker4,931−3
20Windwalker Monk8,478−2
21Destruction Warlock7,912−2
22Balance Druid15,992−2
23Affliction Warlock1,320−2
24Feral Druid5,830+1
25Beast Mastery Hunter35,835−2
26Augmentation Evoker16,6870

These are transcribed historical figures. They are not a new query of Warcraft Logs and should not be used as current class recommendations.

What the Population Column Actually Shows

Subtlety’s source population is 14,760, while Havoc’s is 27,729. Retribution has 47,555—the largest value in this table—and Marksmanship has 1,287. Keeping the digits intact matters before making any claim about representation.

Population is not a census of unique players and is not a measure of a specialization’s execution difficulty. The table cannot tell us why someone chose a spec, whether many records came from the same player or how much experience those players had.

Likewise, a rank and a sample count answer different questions. A specialization can have a large recorded population without leading the ordering, or a smaller one without being a poor choice for a particular encounter.

A Provenance Note for the Source Images

The cause and exact capture timing of that discrepancy are not established by the source. Its position changes and population counts should therefore be cited as the published table’s values, rather than as independently reproduced measurements.

Reading the Movers Without Inventing a Build Explanation

Frost Mage moves up ten places, Elemental seven and Survival six in the table. Arms remains unchanged. These observations do not identify a particular talent, tuning note or encounter mechanic as the cause.

A log review needs the actual target damage, cooldown timing, deaths and gear from the encounter being examined. For how a high-end point differs from the broader recorded distribution, the Week 8 percentile comparison preserves both kinds of chart. For Augmentation’s attribution context, see the Week 13 reference.

Play more. Grind less.

Explore help for the game you are playing.

Browse game services